(versão longa e em português aqui)
The quote is: "Quanto mais conhecedora, formada e informada for uma comunidade melhor estará do ponto de vista social e com maior vantagem competitiva actuará do ponto de vista económico, criando condições para maior apetência para conhecer mais."
Let's say far-fetched:
if(knowledgablecommunity++) {
socialedge++
economicedge++
}
socialedge . economicedge => knowledgablecommunity++
providing such a bullet proof way of infinite community knowledge while keeping growth on the social and economic areas is obviously far-fetched because
economicedge => €e++
knowledgablecommunity => €k--
we can easily see that we have no answer to two important scenarios (€e<€k) and (€e>€k). it can only be read as speculation.
Let's say poorly written:
So much content on a single sentence has got to have drawbacks. Looking at the last group of words, "para maior apetência para conhecer mais" already sounds poor enough.
And yes, it is all on a single sentence. Big no-no.
Conclusions
There are areas on a stated local administration policy, like the knowledge one, where one can not get away unnoticed when publishing something like this.